MOFO republicans

Dr. Scott Lieberman/AP

"I am tired of these motherfucking republicans in our motherfucking government."

Me too.

Oh noes! Teh camels of death

"Enough. The American people do NOT want to ride camels to work. We expect Barak Obama to state clearly that he is not pro-camel. Anything less is divisive."

/Mark Penn

Delusional AND stupid

AP Photo

Feh. The worst thing about Hillary's campaign is that she's been working overtime to make me dislike her. Case in point- take a good look at the sign the kid is holding in the photo.

It reads "Hillary- the Smart Choice." I see. So people who voted for Obama are stupid? What a great strategy- insult your fellow democrats.

First we were delusional, then we were uninformed, and now we're just plain stupid. This, from a woman who has paid Mark Penn millions of dollars. Genius!

No wonder her campaign is going down the tubes.

Update: I added a second photo so that you could see the wording more clearly. I don't know about you, but I've had just about enough of being mocked and insulted by the Clinton campaign.

Rally madness

So we headed down to the debate site to see what sort of festivities were going on. Here's a few of the many pictures I shot. Sorry about the quality- they aren't edited- just downloaded 'em and dumped them into my internet photo page.

Hillary had her peeps out. Apparently Chelsea was there- but it was before we showed up.

Here's the Obama contingent, marching in front Schultz's. The came with a (no lie) 100 piece marching band, courtesy of Reagan High School.

Lots of kids there. Commies! Indoctrinating them young!

Here's part of the big story of Obama in Texas- the republican and female defections. Bad news for both Clinton and McBush.

Cult members.

Delusional cult members. With breasts!

This cop was part of the crowd control unit- when he drove through the crowd, he suddenly flashed an Obama bumbersticker to the Obama contingent.

The Reagan High School band and drill team. It was pretty much a circus for a while.

Oh. My.

Kelly West/Austin American Statesman

The above photo is on the front page of the Austin American Statesman online. Holy moly- for those of you out of state, that's Barack Obama with University of Texas head football coach Mack Brown, and the two UT quarterbacks. They're taking him on a tour of the athletic facility- that room is the newly renovated trophy room, and I'm pretty sure they're looking at the National Championship trophy.

That kind of visual just might doom Hillary's chances in this state. I cannot imagine Hillary touring the athletic facility with a smiling coach Brown.

Ouch.

Austin American Statesman

McBush 2.0 is pRoud! Everyday!

McBush told us last night that he's proud to be, and has always been proud, of America, everyday. He said it with particular emphasis, to make sure we got the point.

Well. Isn't THAT just special? So, Senator McCain, tell us, were you proud of America this day?







New Orleans was drowning, and American citizens were dying while their government twiddled their thumbs. Where were you? Oh yeah, having a little birthday party with your BFF.



Heck of a job, lumpy! kai, thx, bai.

Ack! No one tell trademark Dave

No wonder he hates Obama.

Is Obama a Mac and Clinton a PC?

BTW, Obama's website is teh awesome. Not just in design, but in functionality.

Adventures in Obamaland

I went to the open house for the opening of the Obama campaign in Texas on Saturday. The place was mobbed- they had so many volunteers show up for training that they ended up having to find extra space on another floor. The crowd was a real cross section of Austin- young, old, black, white, hispanic...rich, poor... and the thing I heard over and over and over was, "I've never volunteered for a political campaign before..." There were quite a few 40 and up women there, which doesn't augur well for the Clinton campaign.

The top photo is of Cory Booker, the charismatic young mayor of Newark, who is an extraordinary speaker. I would say the whole thing does have the feeling of a movement, but not in the way that the critics suggest. There's very little talk about Obama himself - it's about community empowerment. It's about people who have felt powerless taking the reins back into their own hands. It's about people with a common vision about this country and what it can be.

Over and over I heard conversations of people describing why they were there- how frustrated they've been and how they feel the tide is turning, because they, themselves are turning it. There were a lot of strangers connecting in almost a sweet way- lots of shy smiles and nods, the sharing of stories... there was some kind of basic, almost primal recognition going on. "I know you, you are part of my tribe." It was community, which is what being a democrat is all about, no? For me it was extraordinarily moving. I've rarely been so proud to be an American.

It just occurred to me that the one thing I didn't hear is how electing Obama was going to do something for me personally. As I've often said, I'm fairly comfortable. I have a good job, a nice place to live, more than enough money, decent healthcare. And for me, this campaign isn't about me. It's about making America a better place for the less fortunate.

Can you imagine a republican event where a bunch of people got all excited about healthcare for the uninsured and the end of poverty? Nope. Didn't think you could.

Ready to Surrender the Red States

Are they kidding? From Politico, (yeah, I know) 'Second-class delegates':

A co-chairman of Hillary's Michigan campaign and has a line that's sure to drive a whole bunch of red state governors up the wall:

"Superdelegates are not second-class delegates," says Joel Ferguson, who will be a superdelegate if Michigan is seated. "The real second-class delegates are the delegates that are picked in red-state caucuses that are never going to vote Democratic."

As a commenter there says, Hillary! Ready to Surrender the Red States on DAY ONE!!

McBush 2.0

Richard Carson/Reuters

Wow. The geezer endorses a slightly younger geezer. That should endear him to the college set.

Also, McBush 2.0 rolls out his plan for the general election. Dems Were Wrong about Iraq. Apparently he thinks the dems should apologize for getting it wrong.

Um, no. If we hadn't invaded Iraq in the first place, then al Queda wouldn't BE in Iraq. But thanks for the heads up on your strategy.

A valentine 4 U

Two hearts, beating as one.....

oh my

Overheard in Austin

Allen Fredrickson/Reuters

A friend emailed me yesterday to tell me about the conversation he overheard at his very conservative, republican borg:

I was just walking down a row of cubes where the sales teams sit to get my lunch and heard one sales guy say to a sales gal, “I am turning into an Obama-ican.” The sales gal says in reply, “Me too.”

And that, my pretties, is why McCain is going to get crushed in the fall.

Condi, come to camera 1

Condi and Gates have an op ed in the WAPO today, asking for congress to agree to let them negotiate a "status of forces" agreement with Iraq. What We Need Next in Iraq. That's their headline- but hilariously, on the front page of the WAPO, the link says "Trust Us."

I guess they've seen the writing on the wall. Well, read this writing- KISS MY CENTAUR ASS!!!

And Harry, if you let them bully you into this too, I'm going to come to DC and pitchfork your worthless ass.

Warmonger - Let's get viral

This is the kind of thing that needs to get out there.

I lurves it.

About Shuster

Over at the crack pit this afternoon there was a lot of cheering over MSNBC's decision to suspend David Shuster for his tasteless, inappropriate and frankly, stupid remarks about Chelsea Clinton. (And a lot of flaming of me for thinking it's all overblown, but iz okay)

As I said over there, I'm not going to defend his remarks, but I do feel free to criticize the Clinton campaign's reaction to the event, which in my opinion is something of an over reaction. They got their well deserved apology, fair enough. But they went further, threatening to boycott NBC and MSNBC forever. Really? and in the same week that Hillary Clinton agreed to do a debate on FAUX news? Last time I checked, FOX still employes some of the wankers who have called the Clintons murderers, traitors, terrorist appeasers and worse.

For what it's worth, Josh at TPM has a similar take on the issue. Any maybe he's right- they couldn't touch Tweety, so they went after Shuster's head. If true, I think that's kind of crappy. YMMV.

Not to beat a dead horse here, but I just get annoyed at democratic politicians' propensity for beating the crap out of peeps who aren't really the enemy. Anyone remember Congress' silly condemnation of Moveon.org's Betray-US? ad? A little perspective would be nice.

Flame away!

(Note: and yes, reporters should not engage in silly gansta or sexist talk on the air. It's unprofessional and counterproductive. And I shouldn't have to explain that my criticism of the Clinton campaign doesn't equate to approval of Shuster's original remarks, but apparently I do. Alas, a blogger's existence, even a 16th tier one, is a cruel existence. However, I shall endeavor to soldier on. Bravely. )

Update: Oy. Josh says the is pressing MSNBC to fire Shuster. I agree with what Atrios said yesterday. It's a fair point that the Clintons are generally held to a different standard than everyone else, and that there's nothing creepy or inappropriate about a family member campaigning for a candidate.

That said, I stand by what I said yesterday. Ruining Shuster's career, a guy who does solid reporting, much of it extremely tough on the Bush administration, is going too far. In the meantime, over at the WH they're capering with glee over the idea that one of their most irritating opponents is going to lose his job. Sheesh Hillary, you've got your pound of flesh, let it go.

Your republican translation machine

Just a reminder, when a republican says they believe in "personal responsibility," what they really mean is:

You're on you fucking own, chump!

The subtext of that is "you shoulda worked hard and gotten right with jesus sooner."

The republican candidates refer to "personal responsibility" in debates and on the stump fairly frequently. But you won't find it on their websites, though the doctrine is implicitly spelled out in their policies.

Republican dead-ender crowds know what it is though. Make no mistake about that. Check this out:

"It was one ovation after another as Bush ran through red meat issues: making tax cuts permanent, extending the surveillance law, winning in Iraq, defeating terrorism, limiting stem cell research, upholding life, appointing conservative judges."

But a telling moment came when Bush was talking about people "swept up in a cycle of addiction, and crime, and hopelessness." Said Bush: "We know that people can change their behavior. Sometimes all it takes is the help of a loving soul -- somebody who puts their arm around a troubled person and says, I love you, can I help you."

Suddenly, as Gillman reported, a woman shouted out very loudly, "I love ya Dubya!"

Bush responded: "My soul is not that troubled, but thank you."

Two things going on here- first, notice those red-meat issues are all about rewarding his base and nothing about the very real economic problems in this country. And second, notice that Bush isn't the least bit troubled by all the damage he's wreaked on society. It's all about him and the adulation of his fan club. Via today's Froomkin.

Have I said today how much I hate these people?

FISA Immunity

My paranoid thought for the day- chimpy and cheney are making a really big stink about keeping telecom immunity in the renewal of the "Protect America Act" (god, but I HATE those fucking cutesy names they make up).

Their reasoning is that no company will want to help the government in the future if they think they might get sued.

You know what that tells me? They've already asked some other private companies to spy on us and so far they've said no. So they're desperate to get Congress to establish the precedent that companies acting in "good faith," even if they should have known better, are off the hook when they break the law.

Makes me wonder what else they're up to, and who else is helping them.

Feh. Congress should just let the whole thing expire. When the CIA squawks, congress can tell them they'll give them $10 million in emergency appropriations to pay for lawyers who do nothing but working on FISA motions. If the technical fix still needs fixing next year, fine. Write a reasonable bill and send it to a sane democratic president to sign.

Otherwise, no dice. And Harry, you pussy, the correct thing to say, both publicly and privately, is, "Suck my democratic dick. Dick."

Yes, I know I have a better chance of waking up with two heads than having Harry follow my excellent advice.

Harry Reid! We HALPS U!!

It's pretty clear to me that Harry Reid knows less about the PR game than he does about how to be a successful majority leader. So I am launching a new feature here, where in I shall endeavor to take Harry's garbled, long-winded mutterings and translate them into easily understood arguments. Along the way I'll also give him some helpful hints on strategy. Feel free to play along in comments.

One hopes that he will be able to take constructive criticism, though I suspect I hope in vain.

So let's get started.

Just today, it appears that the WH is still insisting that the Senate confirm uber-douchebag author of the torture memos Steven Bradbury and won't strike a deal on other nominees unless Reid agrees to let chimpy recess appoint him.

Here's what Reid said on the floor today:

"He said that unless I would agree to allow him to recess appoint Steven Bradbury, he wouldn’t make a deal – he didn’t care if that meant no one got confirmed. He was willing to forgo the 84-plus nominees and the offers of recess appointments if he couldn’t install Mr. Bradbury.

Weak!

Here's what Reid should have said privately:

Bite me.

I always feel concision is best. And here's what he should have said publicly.

The president is holding the nomination process hostage over the torture memo guy. The senate does not negotiate with terrorists.

See? that wasn't so hard. Call his bluff. Tell him to fuck off and die.

Believe me, the public will be on your side.

Let's try another one (isn't this fun?). Today G.O.P. Senators Block Democrats’ Stimulus Plan because dems added benefits for seniors, the unemployed and disabled veterans.

Here's what Harry said (and did) today.

The majority leader, Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, had signaled that Democrats were prepared to force a showdown with Republicans over the $204 billion Senate stimulus package and would not bow to pressure to simply make modest changes to a less expensive plan that was approved by the House last week.

“We should go for the whole package,” Mr. Reid said at a news conference on Tuesday. He waved off assertions by some Republicans that he was bluffing. “Wait until we have this vote, and they’ll find out,” he said. “I am not much of a bluffer.”

Well, no, you're not much of a bluffer. In fact, you suck ass at it. As the article says, you were only able to muster 58 votes, so you let it go with a "paper filibuster."

What he should have said privately to Mitch McConnell:

Bite me, you asshole.

And what he should have said publicly:

"50 votes is a pass. If you don't like it, I suggest you get your wrinkly asses up here on the senate floor and start filibustering. In the meantime, we'll tell the American people how you hate old folks and the unemployed. Have fun!"

None of this is rocket science. And I'm serious as a heart attack about the public language.

Speak clearly, concisely and on point. Show some balls, be right, and the public, as well as the press, will reward you. And hell, the country will be better off too! Imagine the possibilities.

Torture

AP/Jae C. Hong

Would you trust this clown to decide whether it was appropriate for the US government to torture you? (Remember, he's the guy who mocked Karla Fay Tucker's clemency bid, "Don't kill me!") Via Froomkin:

Olivier Knox writes for AFP: "The United States may use waterboarding to question terrorism suspects in the future, the White House said Wednesday, rejecting the widely held belief that the practice amounts to torture.

"'It will depend upon circumstances,' spokesman Tony Fratto said, adding 'the belief that an attack might be imminent, that could be a circumstance that you would definitely want to consider.'

"'The president will listen to the considered judgment of the professionals in the intelligence community and the judgment of the attorney general in terms of the legal consequences of employing a particular technique,' he said.

snip

Knox writes that Fratto "rejected charges that the tactics the Central Intelligence Agency calls 'enhanced interrogation techniques' amount to torture.

"'Torture is illegal. Every enhanced technique that has been used by the Central Intelligence Agency through this program was brought to the Department of Justice and they made a determination that its use under specific circumstances and with safeguards was lawful,' he said."

And here's the kicker: "Asked whether the White House's reasoning was that torture is illegal, the attorney general has certified that the interrogation practices are legal, therefore those practices are not torture, Fratto replied: 'Sure.'"

Great. We just publicly admitted that we commit crimes in contravention against signed treaties.

Okay, Speaker Pelosi. The ball is in your court. The president's spokesman just said that we commit torture, and that the president signs off on it.

Time to impeach. End of story.

MONSTER TUESDAY!!!!! BWA HA HA HA HA!!

MSNBC has been advertising tomorrow as "MONSTER TUESDAY!!"

I'm hoping it means that the guy in the photo is going to show up and perform a little eatage on Tweety. Anytime after 6:00 pm will be okay with me.

I think that is an election day result we can look forward to.

Oooops

U.S. Says It Accidentally Killed 9 Iraqi Civilians

BAGHDAD — American forces said Sunday that they had accidentally killed nine Iraqi civilians and wounded three in a strike aimed at militants of Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia south of Baghdad, acknowledging what appeared to be one of the deadliest cases of mistaken identity in recent weeks.my emphasis added

A military statement released late in the day said the accidental killings happened Saturday in Iskandariya, about 25 miles south of the capital, and that the wounded were taken to American military hospitals.

The statement did not further identify the civilian victims, but the Iraqi police said American aircraft, responding to an attack on an American convoy, had erroneously bombed Iraqi civilian guardsmen who have contracted with the American military to fight Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia.

Those guardsmen, predominantly Sunnis, are considered a major reason the American military has successfully reduced insurgent violence in Iraq. But in recent weeks scores of the Sunni guardsmen, known variously as Concerned Local Citizens, Awakening Councils and the Sons of Iraq, have been killed in clashes with Qaeda fighters and Shiite militia groups.

Allow me to be bitchy and point out that if we weren't in Iraq in the first place, none of this would be happening.

Good job! bombing the guys that were supposed to be helping "the mission."

It's time to exit this clusterfuck. IMHO though, we won't have any realistic chance of getting out of Iraq until we admit that going in was a mistake in the first place.

Farewell John Edwards, and thank you

Matthew Hinton/AFP/Getty Images

If this photo doesn't make break your heart with regret for what might have been.... well, you don't have a heart.

If, as I expect, we elect a democrat this fall to the presidency, that candidate will have been shaped, pushed and pulled by the compelling and brutal honesty of the Edwards campaign. He has been the voice of the poor, the forgotten, and the disenfranchised in this country. He has become our conscience, the voice that says you may not look away from the homeless, the poor, the uninsured. You may not ignore the discarded and the unfortunates whose lives have been ruined by Katrina, or Vietnam or Iraq.

You must look.

And more, you must act.

He changed the debate, and he forced Clinton and Obama to come along with him. He led on every progressive issue and we will have him to thank if the country finally breaks the spell of this insidious, evil neo-gilded age. As Edwards said in his email to supporters yesterday:

This work goes on. It goes on right here in Musicians' Village. There are homes to build here, and in neighborhoods all along the Gulf. The work goes on for the students in crumbling schools just yearning for a chance to get ahead. It goes on for day care workers, for steel workers risking their lives in cities all across this country. And the work goes on for two hundred thousand men and women who wore the uniform of the United States of America, proud veterans, who go to sleep every night under bridges, or in shelters, or on grates, just as the people we saw on the way here today. Their cause is our cause.

Their struggle is our struggle. Their dreams are our dreams.

Do not turn away from these great struggles before us. Do not give up on the causes that we have fought for. Do not walk away from what's possible, because it's time for all of us, all of us together, to make the two Americas one.

Yesterday, after the video cameras turned off, and the stage had been taken down, and most of the reporters had wandered off to cover other candidates, John Edwards picked up a hammer and a drill and went to work building a home for one of the thousands of families displaced by Katrina.

The work goes on.

Thank you, Senator Edwards. Please don't be a stranger.

Krugman has a very fine column today on Edwards as well: The Edwards Effect